![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A different approach to the search problem (AKA "drinking from the firehose") is to use a search engine that uses the # of citations of a particular URL (links to that URL) as part of the relevancy ranking process. Google (<http://google.stanford.edu/>) is one such engine. Google has become my main search engine because 90-95% of the time, if the information is on the Web, it will show up in the top 10 results (and usually in the top 3). It isn't a panacea, but I expect technology like Google's to be adopted by the other search engines as the word of Google's relevancy ranking accuracy spreads. ========================================================== Mark Leighton Fisher Thomson Consumer Electronics fisherm at indy.tce.com Indianapolis, IN "Browser Torture Specialist, First Class"
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.