RE: INEG. INC. Proposal Bylaws Proposal for the ICANN
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: INEG. INC. Proposal Bylaws Proposal for the ICANN



Lets tops playing silly games, is everyone here a grown up or has the bottom dropped out of your worlds and your looking for the cleanex!

Stop behaving like idoits and start to develop the policies and working practices for the net.  I am sure we all can contribute to the work and we can all critise the work, are we talking school boy egos or professionals who want to create something that we can be proud of.

Stop playing games and try cooperating!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Salo [mailto:salo at networkcs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 1998 5:21 PM
To: ietf at ietf.org; wsimpson at greendragon.com
Subject: Re: INEG. INC. Proposal Bylaws Proposal for the ICANN


> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 98 13:58:16 GMT
> From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson at greendragon.com>
> To: IETF ORG <ietf at ietf.org>
> Cc: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com>
> cc: DNS Policy <dnspolicy at ntia.doc.gov>
> Subject: Re: INEG. INC. Proposal Bylaws Proposal for the ICANN
> 	[...]
> I remind you that we had called for formally shunning Allisat (in
> February) and Williams (in July) in the IETF; for abusive language,
> personal attacks, and excessive cross-posting.  Please do not reply to
> Allisat or Williams postings on the IETF list....
> 	[...]
> Oh, I'm sure there are other examples.  Large corporate entities with
> formal proxy voting, for example....
> 	[...]

Another classic "Nobody else should respond to this thread, but I will,
[and please let me have the last word by not responding]" message.

-tjs





Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.