Re: SRS Protocol

To: "Rick H. Wesson" <wessorh at ar.com>
Subject: Re: SRS Protocol
From: Patrik Fältström <paf at swip.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 13:47:25 +0200
Cc: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb at RESEARCH.ATT.COM>, ietf at ietf.org, Michael Mealling <michael at bailey.dscga.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SO4.4.05.9810070858390.13443-100000@ibd.ar.com>
References: <v04101a25b240dc0663b0@[192.71.220.146]>

At 09.03 -0700 98-10-07, Rick H. Wesson wrote:

What i was atempting to say is that there should be an open protocol
for the interaction of registrar/registry.

I just wanted to let you know that I maybe were more optimistic than you regarding the invention of such a protocol.

I agree that the metad BOF did not come far, but on the other hand, being able to limit the scope of a project is also a move in the right direction :-)

I also hope that CORE will publish the SRS protocol as an I-D.

  paf
------------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Researcher                             Email: paf at swip.net
Tele2 AB                                        URL: http://paf.se
Borgarfjordsgatan 16, Kista, Sweden      PGP Key ID: 0xBD236602

  In theory there is no difference between theory and practice,
  but in practice, there is.

References:
- Re: SRS Protocol
  - From: Patrik Fältström
- Re: SRS Protocol
  - From: Rick H. Wesson

Prev by Date: [no subject]
Next by Date: Re: New phone system proposal
Previous by thread: Re: SRS Protocol
Next by thread: FCN STATMENT OF INTENT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: SRS Protocol

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.