![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Fred, As the co-chair of an IETF working group, I must confess to some puzzlement about estimating meeting room size. How can I do this? I really have little idea how many people showed up in my working group at, say, the last four IETF meetings. It is always a g**awful big room full of faces and a long list of names on the blue sheets, but I don't keep any record of how many. Perhaps keeping such statistics is a chair's responsibility, but I was not aware of this. Even if I did know, how would I extrapolate to the NEXT meeting, taking into account things like the overall registration? On the other hand, CNRI *does* have the data necessary to make an informed guess. I know they are terribly busy, but maybe there could be some two-way flow of information between secretariat and WG chairs, to home in on a realistic estimate? It also seems that this estimate must have large error bars, so the actual meeting room should be 30% larger than the one-standard-deviation upper bound. A .67 occupancy works better than a 1.3 occupancy, I believe. At least, it is more comfortable. Maybe with central record keeping we could even learn to do it better. Bob Braden
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.