![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> OK, here speaks a person that hasn't been in a single IETF meeting..so > far. ... > 2) Nametag could alllow access to a IETF Meeting Poll -system, which could > gather all sorts of interesting data on different sessions, evaluating > speakers etc. There should be somekind of a reward on best presentations / > briefings, perhaps sponsored. Working group meetings are for forging consensus on protocol standards, not for educating an audience. If we're going to reward someone, we should reward working groups which reach consensus quickly, not individuals with spiffy and polished presentations.... BTW, what happened to the gold stars (for the WG chairs in the area which got its reports in first)? I don't recall seeing them recently. - Bill
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.