![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
If price is not a consideration, ATM is the hands-down choice for the backbone of this application (in my humble opinion). First, let's discuss why IP is a good choice, but not a great choice: * QoS is not "there" just yet...gigabit QoS is claimed, but still a ways off compared to the ATM solutions * Gigabit ethernet standards are only emerging, quite new, and relatively untested compared to ATM * IP Voice is a featureless voice system, as opposed to using a PBX over ATM. Try to do three-way calling, message waiting lights, etc. over IP voice. It's just not there yet. Now, why ATM is the solution of choice: * ATM is nearly infinitely scalable. While you do not discuss your bandwidth needs per se, you can go anywhere from OC-3 on up to OC-192 (if budget really isn't an issue) and anywhere in between. * ATM runs T-1 circuit emulation for voice-creating QoS and an easy interface for most newer PBXs. * PVCs create application-specific QoS for video, audio, or other applications * Data still runs great over even a truncated OC-3 circuit * If one of the distribution points if off-site, most Telcos or other service providers will offer leased ATM circuits...very few offer IP...and you want to maintain consistency throughout the enterprise. Just my thoughts... Kevin Tucker MIS Labs www.mislabs.com <http://www.mislabs.com> -----Original Message----- From: Constantine Protopapas [mailto:wiztech at cmpnetmail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 17, 1999 11:29 AM To: ietf at ietf.org Cc: Scott Brim Subject: Multi-services network I am in the designing stage for a multiservice network integrating real-time data (Real Audio, stock exchange data), voice (in the near future) and Internet services (e-mail, FTP, http etc.). I would like to get some opinions and feedback from you based on your experience. More to the point, I am looking of possible ways to achieve end-to-end QoS. Since I am not budget-constrained, I look for the best possible solution. I am thinking of using ATM at the core/backbone and TCP/IP on the edge. Conversely, I could use an all-IP environment, but I don't know if QoS can be implemented adequately for the applications required. The reason for this posting is to ask about the different technologies involved, especially in the QoS area. Thank you in advance for your co-operation and assistance. Constantine Protopapas Systems/Network Engineer Wiztech Internet Consulting e-mail: wiztech at cmpnetmail.com Tel: ++301-6801391 ---- STOP THE WAR IN YUGOSLAVIA ----
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.