What institutional form is needed instead of ICANN?

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: What institutional form is needed instead of ICANN?
From: Ronda Hauben <rh120 at columbia.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 09:17:06 -0400 (EDT)

Toward opening up a real discussion over what to do about ICANN 
and recognizing that this is *not* confined to a contest between
NSI and ICANN as it is being portrayed in the U.S. media, 

See in Telepolis:

        What Institutional Form is Needed to Replace ICANN?

        URL: http://www.heise.de/tp/english/inhalt/te/5183/1.html

        See also proposal originally submitted to the NTIA to
         create a solution to the problem rather than ICANN
         http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/dns_proposal.txt


Ronda

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What institutional form is needed instead of ICANN?
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: help with resources
Next by Date: Re: ASCII, Postscript or PDF in IETF drafts
Previous by thread: help with resources
Next by thread: Re: What institutional form is needed instead of ICANN?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

What institutional form is needed instead of ICANN?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.