 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
may i suggest that someone outline the goals of an additional
format before arguing for/against a particular choice?
for example, when carl and i came up with the idea for rfc2629
(xml as a format), we had some very specific problems we were trying to address.
when rfc2629 was written, those goals were documented. you may agree/disagree
with the choice of xml, you may even agree/disagree with our goals, but at least
you have the context in which to have a discussion...
/mtr
|
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.