Re: bad rfc text

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bad rfc text

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: bad rfc text
From: William Allen Simpson <wsimpson at greendragon.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 14:19:37 -0400
References: <37DBD7C6.D0ED485B@greendragon.com>

Hmmm, on inspection, there are a lot of early RFCs from ISI that are not on
ietf.org.  But there are at least 2 at ietf.org that are not at ISI (rfc17
and 189).

WSimpson at UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

References:
- bad rfc text
  - From: William Allen Simpson

Prev by Date: bad rfc text
Next by Date: Labeling of standards: many proposed/draft standards are obsolete
Previous by thread: bad rfc text
Next by thread: Labeling of standards: many proposed/draft standards are obsolete
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.