Re: [iesg-secretary@ietf.org: Last Call: UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646 to Proposed]

[keld at dkuug.dk]

On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 10:34:02AM -0400, Francois Yergeau wrote:
> À 01:38 1999-09-13 +0200, Keld Simonsen a écrit :
> 
> Given the price and accessibility of ISO standard, and especially of 10646,
> it is a fact that the Unicode terminology is much more widely known and
> cannot be simply ignored. 

I am at an Sc2/WG2 (10646) meeting right now and I consulted my fellow
collegues on the term in question, it is "code position". I think
it is fair to also then refer the Unicode "scalar value" when mentioned
the first time, and then use "code position" thruout.

Keld