![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: > The more probable reason is that RFC 2090 was a half-baked idea, and most > people who considered implementing it found (either while reading the specs > or while trying it out) discovered the problems with it. All right, I can accept all of this :-) Are there any recommended alternatives? My application is (as you might have guessed) blasting identical drive images (several hundred MB) to about 90 machines coming up around the same time. Is there a multicast bulk transfer protocol that would be good for this? Obviously, reliable transfer is an issue :-) BTW: In my limited current application, all of the machines are on the same IP subnet. Thanks! -- Tripp Lilley * tripp at perspex.com * http://stargate.sg505.net/~tlilley/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Perl is the preferred programming language of the Libertarian Party, Python that of the Democratic Party, and C that of the Republican Party.
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.