Re: New York Post Editorial: "Yes, ICANN"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New York Post Editorial: "Yes, ICANN"



  *> From ron_lautmann at pacbell.net Tue Sep 28 09:58:41 1999
  *> Reply-To: "Ron Lautmann" <ron_lautmann at pacbell.net>
  *> From: "Ron Lautmann" <ron_lautmann at pacbell.net>
  *> To: <braden at ISI.EDU>
  *> Cc: <ietf at ietf.org>
  *> References: <199909281649.AA15713 at gra.isi.edu>
  *> Subject: Re: New York Post Editorial: "Yes, ICANN"
  *> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:57:44 -0500
  *> MIME-Version: 1.0
  *> Content-Type  *> :   *> text/plain  *> ;   *> charset="iso-8859-1"  *> 
  *> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  *> X-Priority: 3
  *> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
  *> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
  *> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
  *> Content-Length: 449
  *> X-Lines: 18
  *> 
  *> Hey, I didn't write this.  Its an editorial from a newspaper.
  *> 

Sorry, I flew off the handle.

Bob

  *> --Ron Lautmann
  *> ----- Original Message ----- 
  *> From: <braden at ISI.EDU>
  *> To: <ietf at ietf.org>; <ron_lautmann at pacbell.net>
  *> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 11:49 AM
  *> Subject: Re: New York Post Editorial: "Yes, ICANN"
  *> 
  *> 
  *> > 
  *> > Good show, Ron.  Just what we need... using the ICANN, and our
  *> > Internet, as a partisan political football.  Sheesh!!! Have you
  *> > no ethical sense?
  *> > 
  *> > Bob Braden
  *> > 
  *> 
  *> 




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.