Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF



> We have no plans right now to support DS.  We chose to provide FH instead of
> DS because we are able to scale an FH network better.

not a big need if there are no drivers for it.

> We are binging 500 NIC's for sale/loan so scalability is a chief concern.

it's been a week since you went through this at nanog, where we had to go
out and get normal nanog/ietf kit so people could use it.  the ietf is a
much pickier audience.  could we please have the normal kit?

if it don't work, you can't pay people to take it.

randy




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.