Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF

To: a.saha at acm.org (Amlan Saha), Simon Leinen <simon at limmat.switch.ch>
Subject: Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 16:02:34 +0200
Cc: Doug Moeller <dmoeller at nortelnetworks.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <199910121235.UAA28091@queen.cwc.nus.edu.sg>
References: <aan1to98vz.fsf@limmat.switch.ch> <4.2.0.58.19991011163143.01bd2520@165.87.194.218> <aan1to98vz.fsf@limmat.switch.ch>

At 20:05 12.10.99 +0730, Amlan Saha wrote:

AFAIK,  the drivers (on linux)  for the Breezecom cards were written
by a guy  from Ericsson and, last I  knew, the source  code for that
was not available.  Thus the module had to '-f'  inserted if you did
not have the right kernel version.

That was the policy in force on Monday morning.

AFAIK, by Wednesday, Breezecom had released source.

                        Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand at maxware.no

References:
- Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
  - From: Simon Leinen
- Wireless @ D.C. IETF
  - From: Doug Moeller
- Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
  - From: Amlan Saha

Prev by Date: Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
Next by Date: Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF (fwd)
Previous by thread: Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
Next by thread: Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Wireless @ D.C. IETF

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.