Re: tarballs of RFCs, internet-drafts and ietf-washington wg agenda

To: braden at ISI.EDU
Subject: Re: tarballs of RFCs, internet-drafts and ietf-washington wg agenda
From: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 01:12:10 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: ietf at ietf.org, Marc.Blanchet at viagenie.qc.ca, support at normos.org
In-reply-to: <199911060023.AA12658@gra.isi.edu>
Organization: speaking for none
Reply-to: Lloyd Wood <L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>

On Fri, 5 Nov 1999 braden at ISI.EDU wrote:

>   *> - all RFCs (26M)
>   *> - all internet-drafts (21M)
> 
> Exponential growth at work.  Thanks heavens for the RFC Editor,
> not all I-Ds make it to RFC, or we would be awash and sinking!

just because you're busy bailing out doesn't mean that you're not
going down with the ship.

L.

try graphing the _length_ of RFCs against their publication dates.
Exponential growth at work.

<L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>

References:
- Re: tarballs of RFCs, internet-drafts and ietf-washington wg agenda
  - From: braden

Prev by Date: Re: tarballs of RFCs, internet-drafts and ietf-washington wg agenda
Next by Date: Re: Still packing for DC? Don't forget your hand drums...
Previous by thread: Re: tarballs of RFCs, internet-drafts and ietf-washington wg agenda
Next by thread: get paid by put your info.!!!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: tarballs of RFCs, internet-drafts and ietf-washington wg agenda

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.