Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)

To: Brian Lloyd <brian at lloyd.com>
Subject: Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)
From: Mark Atwood <mra at pobox.com>
Date: 01 Dec 1999 00:17:30 -0800
Cc: "Dr. Jai Maharaj" <jai at mantra.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Brian Lloyd's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:40:06 -0800 (PST)"
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.9911302244040.7831-100000@keith.fenris.net>

Brian Lloyd <brian at lloyd.com> writes:
> 
> Pardon me but, horse hocky!  We are not talking about objecting to the
> laws but rather how the FBI reacted to a report of a crime.  Even tho'
> they were pretty sure that they had been handed a red herring they were
> still required to investigate.  Makes sense to me.

If it's so routine, why is it so redacted?


-- 
Mark Atwood               | 
mra at pobox.com             | 
http://www.pobox.com/~mra |

References:
- Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)
  - From: Brian Lloyd

Prev by Date: Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)
Next by Date: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Previous by thread: Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)
Next by thread: Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Crypto Advocate Under FBI Investigation (For Treason)

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.