![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bob, Bob Braden wrote: > > *> > *> The problem is not to make applications "NAT aware" or "NAT friendly". The > *> problem is to make applications "IP address unaware". What is an > *> application doing exchanging and using names for things 2 layers below it? > *> Sounds like a design for trouble if I ever heard of one. > > I don't believe this argument, John. The IP address is (part of) the > transport layer end point address, something that an application can > reasonably be expected to know about in the existing Internet > architecture. Unfortunately the existing Internet is no longer an implementaion of the existing Internet architecture. That's why we have a problem. Brian
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.