![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cary, > Is this something that you think is an inherent flaw in DNS? Inherent flaw in the DNS: probably not. Inherent flaws in implementations of DNS (including, of course, ISC's BIND) and things in front of the DNS: probably. It is far too easy to do the wrong thing. And if this is true today, just wait -- DNSSEC and IPv6-related RRs create entire new universes of "interesting" configuration options with some _really_ fun interactions. > Will this new class > of servers be less susceptible to congestion? I am a bit skeptical that congestion is the problem. I suspect misconfiguration (lame servers, bad ACLs, broken firewall rules, etc.) is a more likely cause that results in retransmissions. Rgds, -drc
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.