DNS performance (Re: To address or NAT to address?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DNS performance (Re: To address or NAT to address?)



At 11:43 01.12.99 -0500, Christian Huitema wrote:
At 10:49 PM 11/30/99 -0500, Keith Moore wrote:

>note also that DNS is often slow, and seems less reliable than IP.
>by increasing the reliance on DNS you increase the probability of failure.

Data point: out of 40,000 random DNS requests logged on my work station
over the last year, 20% underwent at least one retransmission, resulting in
service times larger than 2 seconds. The average packet loss rate on the
regular IP service only explain about half of these retransmissions, which
makes me suspect that a lot of additional losses are caused by congested
DNS servers. Increasing our reliance on the DNS is definitely not a good idea.

(Wow - a real measurement! Can this be the IETF list....? Thanks!)

Question: Out of those 8.000 retransmitted DNS queries, do you have any data on how many eventually returned data, versus how many resulted in NXDOMAIN or no data?
There used to be a bug with caching of negative responses....


                           Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand at edb.maxware.no




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.