Re: To address or NAT to address?

To: Peter Deutsch <peterd at videotron.ca>, "David R. Conrad" <David_Conrad at isc.org>
Subject: Re: To address or NAT to address?
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 09:35:35 +0100
Cc: "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep at iprg.nokia.com>, Yakov Rekhter <yakov at cisco.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <3846FA2D.9A15E81A@videotron.ca>
References: <199912021627.IAA08159@omega.cisco.com> <3846B5D3.BFDFA7E8@iprg.nokia.com> <3846EC46.57EE6561@isc.org>

At 18:01 02.12.99 -0500, Peter Deutsch wrote:

Actually, it's still a relatively simple lookup mechanism (boolean
domain names, anyone? :-)


RFC 2673.
Sorry, just couldn't resist :-)

           Harald


--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand at edb.maxware.no

References:
- Re: To address or NAT to address?
  - From: Yakov Rekhter
- Re: To address or NAT to address?
  - From: Charles E. Perkins
- Re: To address or NAT to address?
  - From: David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address?
  - From: Peter Deutsch

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.