Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

To: Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Subject: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
From: "Matt Crawford" <crawdad at fnal.gov>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 14:40:06 -0600
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 07 Dec 1999 11:20:00 PST. <E11vQ9Y-000IVD-00@rip.psg.com>
Sender: crawdad at gungnir.fnal.gov

> > the idea is that IPv6 site renumbering will be so much easier than for
> > IPv4 that renumbering will be *less* painful than NATting.
> 
> this needs to be reconciled with the *much* more conservative statements on
> v6 renumber-ability coming from respected v6 folk such as deering et alia.

Whoa, Randy, time out.  Can you cite such a statement which conflicts
with what Brian wrote above?
					Matt

References:
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Randy Bush

Prev by Date: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Next by Date: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Previous by thread: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Next by thread: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.