Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

[Kim Hubbard <kimh at arin.net>]

At 06:05 PM 12/7/99 -0800, Rick H Wesson wrote:
>
>randy,
>
>just because routers meltdown from leaks and mis-configurations is not a
>reasonable justification for ARIN's tight policies on IPv4 allocations,
>which kim stated earlier was to keep space aggrigated for router memory
>requirements, adding speed and processing power to that definition still
>does not justify the strict policy decisions.
>
>-rick

Hmm, so you don't believe we should bother with aggregation of address
space?  You should come to an ARIN public policy meeting and propose
this..should be interesting :-)

Kim

>On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> it's not the memory.  it's the processing power required which is quite
>> non-linear.
>> 
>> it's not the memory for the /24s in old b space, it's the horrifying *large*
>> and *long* meltdowns caused by inadvertant leakage of bogus announcements of
>> /24s in old b space
>> 
>> randy
>>