Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

[Brian E Carpenter <brian at hursley.ibm.com>]

The point is that even conservative policies could easily allow a /64
per household.

  Brian

Sean Doran wrote:
> 
> | 1. if IPv6 allocation policies aren't a fair amount more liberal
> |    than IPv4 ones in how much address space is doled out, they're
> |    broken.  there's still a need to aggregate addresses for routing
> |    purposes, but there's no need to be stingy about doling them out.
> 
> We are agreed that there is absolutely a need to aggregate
> addresses for routing purposes, whether we are talking IPv4
> or IPv6.
> 
> So, how many /20s are there in IPv6?
> 
>         Sean.