Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry at piermont.com>
Date: 08 Dec 1999 20:03:17 -0500
Cc: Daniel Senie <dts at senie.com>, Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>, Randy Bush <randy at PSG.COM>, ietf <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Harald Tveit Alvestrand's message of "Wed, 08 Dec 1999 17:47:59 +0100"
References: <199912080149.UAA25905@astro.cs.utk.edu> <4.2.0.58.19991208123312.034c2b10@dokka.maxware.no> <4.2.0.58.19991208174038.02eb2f00@dokka.maxware.no>

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no> writes:
> A /48 leaves 16 bits for subnetting, before you hit the 64 bits of flatspace.

And remember, if we ever need to, we can start subnetting the bottom
64 bits, at the loss of one form of stateless autoconf (which I'm
starting to find, in deployment, is too unpleasant to use on my nets anyway).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Matt Crawford

References:
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Next by Date: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Previous by thread: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Next by thread: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.