Re: Email messages: How large is too large?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Email messages: How large is too large?





> > But how large is too large? > > I imposed a 5 MB limit here after someone sent a single message of more > than 100 MB to one of our dialup users. This past week I had a user > get upset that we wouldn't accept a 28 MB message he wanted someone to > send him.

He's probably now looking for a new ISP ...


Not every user requires this kind of bandwidth today, but the
applications to generate sch data are here (sound, multiple still
images, video, sharing executables, etc). You can't unring the bell, so
it's probably worthwhile to study what can be done to mitigate the
impact.


The simple fact is that E-Mail attachments are only going to get bigger and more frequent, for no other reason than RFC2305 and RFC2532 The Internet Fax standards that use SMTP.

You can purchase IFAX machines today from HP, Panasonic and Konica. Every Japanese manufacturer of fax machines is in the process of bringing to market low cost devices that support these standards for mass global distribution. The ROI and cost benefits to users are quite compelling.

Oh ..BTW in the US there are at least 15 free fax to email services and more on the way. (see my sig file below)

ISP's and corporate email administrators should just get used to large and frequent email attachments, upgrade their systems, or watch their customers or job go somewhere else.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting LLC 8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110 St. Louis, MO 63119 Voice 314.918.9020 eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax) INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey at ix.netcom.com GSTN Fax 314.918.9015 MediaGate iPost VoiceMail and Fax 800.260.4464 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.