Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

To: Christian Huitema <huitema at research.telcordia.com>
Subject: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 16:25:04 -0800
Cc: John Stracke <francis at ECAL.COM>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <4.1.19991214174828.009fc200@mailee.research.telcordia.com>
References: <3856B6A6.46255A81@ecal.com> <4.1.19991214144214.00a53750@mailee.research.telcordia.com>

At 02:50 PM 12/14/1999 , Christian Huitema wrote:

No. This is no different from the present situation. BGP does not recompute
routes in case of congestion. It is a problem that we are stuck with today,
that multi-address multi-homing actually gives us the hope of solving.

Only minimally, as long as a TCP connection is tied to an IP address...

d/

ps. Christian and I separately suggested changing this, to support IP mobility, a few years ago.

=-=-=-=-= Dave Crocker <dcrocker at brandenburg.com> Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com> Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464 675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Bill Sommerfeld

References:
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: John Stracke
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Christian Huitema
- Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
  - From: Christian Huitema

Prev by Date: RE: whois?
Next by Date: NHRP
Previous by thread: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Next by thread: Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: IP network address assignments/allocations information?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.