Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
From: Kent Crispin <kent at songbird.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 08:24:12 -0800
In-reply-to: <345201.3155638179@[192.168.111.25]>; from Patrik Fältström on Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 02:09:39PM +0100
Mail-followup-to: ietf at ietf.org
References: <4.2.0.58.19991231023801.04268b60@dokka.maxware.no> <345201.3155638179@[192.168.111.25]>

On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 02:09:39PM +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> --On 99-12-31 02.39 +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no> 
> wrote:
> 
> > but think that the title should be "The NSI Registry Registrar Protocol,
> > version 1.1.0", to avoid confusion with any competing Registry/Registrar
> > protocol that may appear later.
> 
> Agreed!

Likewise.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Do good, and you'll be
kent at songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain

References:
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
  - From: Patrik Fältström

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
Next by Date: FAQ: The IETF+Censored list
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
Next by thread: Clarification regarding RFC 1406 and RFC 2495
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.