Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational

Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational

To: Rick H Wesson <wessorh at ar.com>, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com>
Subject: Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
From: Patrik Fältström <paf at swip.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2000 16:17:15 +0100
Cc: Ed Gerck <egerck at nma.com>, "David R. Conrad" <David.Conrad at iengines.com>, Ian Jackson <ijackson at chiark.greenend.org.uk>, iesg at ietf.org, Scott Hollenbeck <shollenb at netsol.com>, ietf at ietf.org, Karl Auerbach <karl at cavebear.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001050703120.15642-100000@loki.ar.com>

--On 2000-01-05 07.04 -0800, Rick H Wesson <wessorh at ar.com> wrote:

the RFC is what will be used, RRP version 1.1.0 is in the OT&E (test
environemnt) slated to be put into general availability on Jan 15th.

The current version in production is RRP 1.0.6


The I-D in question states in the first sentence of section 1:

   This document describes the specifications for the Registry Registrar
   Protocol (RRP) version 1.1.0

That is enough for me, as John points out.

   Patrik Fältström
   Area Director, Applications Area, IETF

References:
- Re: Back to the drawing board, was Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational
  - From: Rick H Wesson

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.