Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational

[Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu]

On Tue, 04 Jan 2000 15:58:37 PST, Rick H Wesson said:
> think the IESG could at least put a "bad bad protocol" sitcker on it when
> they its published, or better yet give it a negative RFC number starting with 
> negative RFC numbers would at least put it firmly into the minds of
> readers that the RFc should *not* be followed.

For a moment, I thought "but you can do that now..."

Then I took a look at RFC2026 in closer detail, and section 3.3 (e)
defines a "Not Recommended" status, just like I remembered.

Unfortunately, that seems to be strictly applicable to standards-track
documents only, not 'informational'.  Whether this is a bug or a feature
I'll let others decide - it looks like a giant economy sized can-o-worms.

-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Operating Systems Analyst
				Virginia Tech

Attachment: pgpzIo0qDVC4f.pgp
Description: PGP signature