![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Austin Schutz wrote: > It wouuld be possible to have all the mailing lists redistributed > using some babelfish-like mechanism for translation, though obviously that > wouldn't cover all languages and wouldn't do any well. Maybe better than > nothing. Probably worse than nothing, unless there are much better translators than babelfish out there. WG discussions get down to really niggly points; a translator that doesn't work *perfectly* is likely to make things worse. At least today, if we're talking through a language barrier, there's a human brain doing the translation, able to recognize problems and rephrase as needed. -- /==============================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.| |Chief Scientist |=============================================| |eCal Corp. |Never mind the GUIs--Unix won't be for the | |francis at ecal.com|masses until we fix backspace & delete. | \==============================================================/
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.