![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi folks and all, I think that as much conflicts that can be solved without the traditional way: regulation + represion = burocracy + injustice, will be better for users. Of course that always will remain Gansters that will require traditional represion ways, i.e.: At 02:25 02/04/00 +0300, Stephanos Piperoglou wrote: > >Cover your sensitive parts, because you're about to be hit by a big >cluestick. But on privacy questions we can try first to give technical solutions, i.e. ways to follow stamped data to oversee companies behavior and then inform users about it automaticaly when they get in contact with these companies,..., well I don´t know which utilities will work, but I think is worthy to try some before being driven to legal solutions that only will be able to reapir damages not to avoid them. Does anyone know about any woorking group about this, that cost least than 50.000 $? Thank you, Salva
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.