Re: prohibiting RFC publication

To: IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Subject: Re: prohibiting RFC publication
From: John Stracke <francis at ecal.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:02:24 -0400
References: <4.3.0.20000408142118.00d31d50@mail.bayarea.net> <4.3.1.2.20000409131927.02a6c100@flipper.cisco.com> <4.2.0.58.20000410075207.0095d970@avarice.inner.net>
Sender: francis at localhost.localdomain

RJ Atkinson wrote:

> While the folks in this discussion might
> disagree on which drafts fall in that category, everyone believes that at least
> some documents ought not be published in an IETF-related archival document series.

Mmm...I think the patent thread pointed out that, if we archived all the I-Ds, it'd be a
good repository for patent examiners to search.  Since some people patent bad ideas,
archiving bad ideas would be useful there.

--
/===============================================================\
|John Stracke    | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. |
|Chief Scientist |==============================================|
|eCal Corp.      |All your problems can be solved by not caring!|
|francis at ecal.com|                                              |
\===============================================================/

References:
- prohibiting RFC publication
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication
  - From: Fred Baker
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication
  - From: RJ Atkinson

Prev by Date: Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt
Next by Date: Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt
Previous by thread: Re: prohibiting RFC publication
Next by thread: Re: prohibiting RFC publication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: prohibiting RFC publication

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.