Re: prohibiting RFC publication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: prohibiting RFC publication

To: RJ Atkinson <rja at inet.org>
Subject: Re: prohibiting RFC publication
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:39:06 -0400
Cc: Peter Deutsch in Mountain View <pdeutsch at EARTHLINK.NET>, IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Apr 2000 07:59:24 BST." <4.2.0.58.20000410075207.0095d970@avarice.inner.net>
Sender: moore at cs.utk.edu

> The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,

that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
is it really true?  it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication
  - From: John Martin

References:
- Re: prohibiting RFC publication
  - From: RJ Atkinson

Prev by Date: Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt
Next by Date: Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt
Previous by thread: Re: prohibiting RFC publication
Next by thread: Re: prohibiting RFC publication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.