![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> > > The I-D in question has been referred to an existing IETF WG for review,
> >
> >that assertion was made, but not confirmed by the ADs.
> >is it really true? it seems odd because it really isn't in scope for wrec.
>
> Let me jog your memory:
yes, I remember that wrec said there wasn't a conflict with its work. that's not the same thing as wrec discussing whether the approach is technically sound or whether the document is worthy of publication.
John
--------------------------------------------------------------- Network Appliance Direct / Voicemail: +31 23 567 9615 Kruisweg 799 Fax: +31 23 567 9699 NL-2132 NG Hoofddorp Main Office: +31 23 567 9600 ---------------------------------------------------------------
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.