Re: prohibiting RFC publication
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: prohibiting RFC publication



At 02:38 AM 4/9/00 +0100, Martin J.G. Williams wrote:
As far as i'm concerned (IMHO) if the standards bodies were to be driven by the
vendors, then they would become no more
than sanitised purveyors of de facto standards, and je jure standards would be
relegated to being nothing more than "misty-eyed" memories.

Are you saying that IETF specifications are de jure standards? If so, don't tell the State Department, they don't know that :^)


IETF Specifications are indeed de facto standards - they are standards in part because the community calls them such, but mostly because the community implements them and uses them.

I think what you meant to say is that they would be nothing more than purveyors of the proprietary protocols that vendors chose to make semi-public.




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.