Re: interception proxies

To: "BookIII, Robert" <Robert.BookIII at cwusa.com>
Subject: Re: interception proxies
From: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:58:30 -0700
Cc: Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <F685A00DB7B4D111B2400020AFFC2D580847EF3B@us-cwi-exc-a03.cwi.cablew.com>

"BookIII, Robert" wrote:
> 
> Joe,
>         Am I to presume by your statement that you are of the mind that the
> time for considering whether vs. which has already come and gone? Is there
> anyone on this list who thinks that?

With respect to 'inside the WG', yes, the assumption has been (to me)
that the time had passed, with respect to the WG charter.

There is always time outside the WG to do so, or (if directed) to
recharter, pending interest and approval of the WG as well.

Joe

References:
- RE: interception proxies
  - From: BookIII, Robert

Prev by Date: RE: interception proxies
Next by Date: Re: interception proxies
Previous by thread: RE: interception proxies
Next by thread: Re: interception proxies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: interception proxies

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.