Re: interception proxies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: interception proxies

To: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: interception proxies
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 19:59:45 -0400
Cc: Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:03:02 PDT." <38F384F6.B0238438@isi.edu>
Sender: moore at cs.utk.edu

> This was a choice - in some larger sense, if sourcing other-owned IP
> addresses or TCP connections is considered an architectural problem,
> needs to come down from above, rather than up from WREC. 

sounds like a convenient excuse to me...
where did the wrec folks get the idea that the IP specification was obsolete?

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- Re: interception proxies
  - From: John Martin
- Re: interception proxies
  - From: Joe Touch
- Re: interception proxies
  - From: Dick St.Peters
- Re: interception proxies
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- Re: interception proxies
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: interception proxies
Next by Date: Re: interception proxies
Previous by thread: Re: interception proxies
Next by thread: Re: interception proxies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.