![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> Call me a non-team playing scab, but I refuse to the honor the old guild > work rule that limits the questions I can consider. If sourcing > other-owned etc. or anything else is an architectural or other problem, > then professional pride ought to force one to raise the issue insetad of > waiting for the AD, IESG, IAB, or a plenary to redirect things. agree entirely. but for this to work there have to be folks within the WG who are willing to raise a fuss. Keith
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.