Re: interception proxies

To: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: interception proxies
From: Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:08:18 -0700
Cc: Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com>, ietf at ietf.org
References: <200004122112.RAA03933@astro.cs.utk.edu>


Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> > As to the known-probs doc, that focuses on problems of the sort that
> > TCPIMPL did - errors in the implementation, not deliberately changing
> > specs.
> 
> yes, but given that there are no specs for interception proxies,
> how do you judge what is and is not an error in the implementation?
> or given that all interception proxies violate the IP specifications,
> isn't an interception proxy by its very nature an implementation error?

This is related to TCPIMPL - new modifications to TCP are not considered
in the known-problems doc. Even if there are problems in the design of
the modification.

Joe

References:
- Re: interception proxies
  - From: Keith Moore

Prev by Date: Re: Source address (offtopic)
Next by Date: Re: breaking the IP model (or not)
Previous by thread: Re: interception proxies
Next by thread: Re: interception proxies
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: interception proxies

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.