![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I agree with John and Bob Braden on this. We shouldn't worry about people who lurk for a few meetings and then participate, or people who lurk in some WGs and participate in others. We *should* worry about people who come to the IETF once and never come back - because they probably came to the wrong meeting, and went home unhappy. Brian John Beck wrote: > > Keith> I honestly don't know how many of the 'lurkers' in any particular room > Keith> are actively participating in some WG versus how many are lurking in > Keith> all of them. but I do know that a large number of lurkers is harmful > Keith> to a WG's ability to conduct a useful meeting. > > How so? If they're just lurking, the only harm I could see is taking up > space in the room. I started out more or less lurking, mainly just to make > sure people didn't try to do something stupid in my areas of interest. But > gradually over time I found I was able to participate at a more meaningful > level. So lurking can be a Good Thing, from a certain point of view. > > -- John
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.