![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bill, This is an excellent illustration of why newcomers need to be mentored. Brian Bill Manning wrote: > > % > Bill said: > % > a "winnowing" process is now in effect, making it harder, perhaps > % > much harder to allow individual contribution. If I was starting today, > % > I'd avoid the IETF as a venue. > % > % If we are projecting this image, it's a problem. But given the constant > % increase in attendance, I doubt if it's really the case. Certainly in my > % own WG we have some very active participants who weren't at all involved when > % we started, and some of the early activists have moved on. > % > % If you think that good newcomers are not getting a fair hearing, recommend > % them to the ADs as WG chairs. And mentor any newcomers that you happen to know. > % > % Brian > > I have reason to beleive that newcomers are NOT getting a fair hearing. > Attached is a sanitized bit of email I received in the last week. > ------------------------------------ > > < Just surfed the <WG> archive in response to the issues raised at > <the IETF plenary. Are the recent posts representative of the standard mode > <of discussion for the list? > < > < I am trying to decide the extent to which I wish to become involved > <in the <specific> area. So far I have had the area director hiss at me when I > <stated my company name at the <WG> meeting and been told that certain > <solutions could not exist because 'so many clever people have already > <considered the problem'. > > -- > --bill
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.