![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> % in my experience, plenty of bad ideas survive such "vetting". > % but those who bring them to IETF still expect the rubber stamp. > % > > True. The point being that the IETF is becoming a "rubber-stamp" for > work already complete. outsiders have tried to treat IETF like a rubber stamp for years; this is nothing new. but in my experience, IETF doesn't function that way - working groups feel quite free to change or discard earlier work. (some are even hostile to earlier work) Keith
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.