![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Michael Richardson wrote: > >>>>> "James" == James M Galvin <galvin at ACM.ORG> writes: > James> On the other hand, I think it's a feature to be able to send documents > James> (even text-based documents) as attachments as opposed to inline and I > James> further consider it a feature that Internet Draft announcements and RFC > James> announcements are multipart with functional pointers to the > > Emphasis on *pointers* > > Sending of IDs to the WG lists is a terrible practice. WG lists are archived. For historical research and memory, sending a text ID to a WG has its advantages. L. <L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.