Re: Eliminating Virus Spam
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eliminating Virus Spam



On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Michael Richardson wrote:

> >>>>> "James" == James M Galvin <galvin at ACM.ORG> writes:
>     James> On the other hand, I think it's a feature to be able to send documents
>     James> (even text-based documents) as attachments as opposed to inline and I
>     James> further consider it a feature that Internet Draft announcements and RFC
>     James> announcements are multipart with functional pointers to the
>   
>   Emphasis on *pointers*
>   
>   Sending of IDs to the WG lists is a terrible practice.

WG lists are archived. For historical research and memory, sending a
text ID to a WG has its advantages.

L.

<L.Wood at surrey.ac.uk>PGP<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/>




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.