![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This distinction between filtering content and virus scanning is confusing because they are not the same thing. To choose to filter content (restrict it to text/plain or some other limited set) would be changing the policy of this elist. That is more than an operational decision and probably deserves more debate, although not here. To choose to scan for viruses is an operational decision. I never said anything about safety. You can not do virus scanning principally for safety reasons. To be sure that's a contributing factor but the truth is you're only as safe as your last virus description update. We're all whining about vacation and virus notices and how we want them filtered off the elist and I just don't see how filtering for viruses in the first place is any different. This is about being a "good net citizen". Sending a virus to me (the royal "me" because like Ted T'so viruses are irrelevant to me personally since I use a UNIX box, a safe MUA, and my email system scans for viruses) is only going to teach me that you know how to contribute to the abuse of the Internet. The source of the problem is not me for letting you send me a virus. The source of the problem is the originator who sent the message and the IETF elist is being used like an open email relay is used by spammers. The IETF elist is irresponsibly contributing to the waste of resources and abuse of the Internet. Send the problem back to the originator, not to me. Unsubscribing them may make you feel better but it doesn't give you the chance to chastise them, again and again if you're lucky. And the argument about virus scanning being platform specific is specious. Your vulnerability to a virus is directly proportional to how well you protect yourself. Software developers/suppliers contribute to this problem but if you were protecting yourself they wouldn't be in business. Microsoft Windows may be the predominant OS that supports applications that contribute to the development and distribution of viruses, but it is the application data that is the virus not the OS. Microsoft Word macros can be run on UNIX and text/html with javascript runs virtually anywhere. A virus scanner scans content, a sequence of bytes. It can do this on any platform, regardless of the intended destination platform of the content. The virus may be platform specific but that is irrelevant. Jim
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.