![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
> second, if someone must send an executable attachment , then we have a > signing server that signs the attachment as trustworthy and how, and using what criteria, would the signing server evaluate the trustworthiness of the attachment? e.g. I might consider an attachment that installed NetBSD on top of an existing Windows system to be absolutely trustworthy (so long as it did it's job well) and performing a valuable community service, but others might not agree... (they might insist that Linux be installed instead.) Keith
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.