![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
each recipient chooses mailserver to subscribe whose sig you trust ....i.e. a distributed, heteroegenous system. for exampl,e i dont really care about windows viruses in my mail since i read mail on a unix system, so i would subscribe to a listserver that signed windows executables and visual basic attacments as ok....:-) In message <200101041508.KAA02702 at astro.cs.utk.edu>, Keith Moore typed: >>> second, if someone must send an executable attachment , then we have a >>> signing server that signs the attachment as trustworthy >> >>and how, and using what criteria, would the signing server evaluate >>the trustworthiness of the attachment? >> >>e.g. I might consider an attachment that installed NetBSD on top >>of an existing Windows system to be absolutely trustworthy >>(so long as it did it's job well) and performing a valuable community >>service, but others might not agree... >>(they might insist that Linux be installed instead.) >> >>Keith cheers jon
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.