![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001 09:40:41 MST, Vernon Schryver <vjs at calcite.rhyolite.com> said: > It would be more of a 21st century something to have the IETF join > Microsoft in equating authentication (e.g. signing) with authorization > (e.g. who gets to run programs on your computers). However, "solution" > is not the best word for what it would be. Authentication: "Yes, your driver's license, fingerprint, retina, and voice scans all agree you are the *real* Jeffrey Dahmer." Authorization: "Would you like to borrow a steak knife, Mr Dahmer?" Amazingly enough, we tolerate that same exact logical disconnect from a major vendor of system software. Unfortunately, between the even-worse than current shrink-wrap licensing included in UCITA, and the incoming presidential administration, it may take a really creative lawyer making a case of it being a "crime against humanity" and trying the case at The Hague to fix it... ;( Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.