Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users

To: Harald Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 22:49:17 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 01:11:12 +0100." <4.3.2.7.2.20010123010921.0652df08@127.0.0.1>
References: <200101210722.CAA09506@astro.cs.utk.edu> <4.3.2.7.2.20010123010921.0652df08@127.0.0.1>

On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 01:11:12 +0100, Harald Alvestrand <Harald at Alvestrand.no>  said:
> I liked even better the horror story of the gateway that tried.....
> until someone wrote "this gateway translates jcb at host.company.com into 
> john.c.braindead at company.com", and it came out to the recipient as
> "this gateway translates john.c.braindead at company.com into 
> john.c.braindead at company.com".....which somehow failed to get the point 
> across....

The best one-paragraph summary of RFC2993 I've seen yet.

/V

References:
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
  - From: Harald Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
Next by Date: Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
Previous by thread: Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
Next by thread: Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.