Re: solution to NAT and multihoming

To: "James P. Salsman" <bovik at best.com>
Subject: Re: solution to NAT and multihoming
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:05:55 -0500
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:33:38 PST." <200101291133.DAA08545@shell9.ba.best.com>
Sender: moore at cs.utk.edu

> If you want to be part of the global address space and you are
> behind a NAT box, get a PPP account outside your NAT box and
> connect to it with TCP or SSH or SSL or UDP or HTTP or whatever
> (see for example the use of PPP over telnet, in the www.ora.com
> Turtle PPP book.)
> 
> What IPv4 NAT issue doesn't that solve, if any?

it doesn't provide any more global address space for all of the
hosts that would like to run applications that require it.

Keith

Follow-Ups:
- economies of scale (was Re: solution to NAT...)
  - From: James P. Salsman

References:
- RE: solution to NAT and multihoming
  - From: James P. Salsman

Prev by Date: Re: solution to NAT and multihoming
Next by Date: Re: Blast from the past
Previous by thread: Re: solution to NAT and multihoming
Next by thread: economies of scale (was Re: solution to NAT...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: solution to NAT and multihoming

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.