Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

To: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins at dsperkins.com>
Subject: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:34:15 -0500
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr at research.solidum.com>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:40:34 PST." <5.0.2.1.2.20010131153254.029726a0@mail.scruznet.com>
Sender: moore at cs.utk.edu

> On the list below, I believe that peer-to-peer applications like
> napster can work in a NAT world. All you need is a registration
> and rendezvous service to put the two peers together. 

why do people so often assume that there are *two* peers?

Ketih

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
  - From: Bill Manning

References:
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
  - From: David T. Perkins

Prev by Date: RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Next by Date: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Previous by thread: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Next by thread: Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.